Peace to the Sky
Sky to the Earth
Earth beneath the Sky
Strength in Everyone.
~ from Morrigu’s Prophecy

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Identity in Exopolitical Mediation: Exopolitics Applied

IDENTITY IN EXOPOLITCAL MEDIATION: EXOPOLITICS APPLIED
By Cyrellys Geibhendach
February 7, 2011
Original: http://hubpages.com/hub/Identity-in-exopolitical-mediation-exopolitics-applied

When we work within the context of Exopolitical Mediation one of the subjects which presents itself for our attention is that of Identity. Identity is applicable to two different venues within exopolitical mediation. One venue being that of individuals within the covertly operating contact control structure and the other venue being in regards to extra-terrestrial contact or interaction under the currently theoretical scientific heading of astrobiology or the alternative paradigm field of Exopolitics. The first venue addresses the question of identity with its associated issues to the individuals whether they are whistleblowers, sanctioned operatives, or outside of the established contact control structure (CCS) as contactees or abductees, all of whom hold multiple identities out of necessity. The second pertains directly in relation to the extraterrestrials themselves and enters the realms of inter-specie and intercultural exchanges which back-feed into humanity’s diverse identity construction and characteristics.

For the purpose of this examination, I will not be presenting information in a context to prove to observers that extraterrestrial contact has occurred. This context is outside the scope of this work and would detract from the study of identity as it pertains to exopolitical mediation which operates within the context of Contact as a historical fact; hidden in plain view beneath an uninformed publics’ operative conscious awareness. This work is proceeding beyond the need for proving this paradigm to its readers. It is this author’s recommendation for anyone requiring contextual support in understanding the existence of Contact to refer to the work of Dr Michael Salla of the Exopolitics Institute[1], Steven Bassett of Paradigm Research Group[2], Dr. Steven Greer of the Disclosure Project[3], and Larry W. Bryant one of the leading ufological specialists in FOIA pursuit and operator of Washington DC office of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS)[4].

Identity is about delineating relations and interrelations. It is a way to identify sameness and differences which allow us to better understand ourselves and other individuals or groups in our experience. It is this need to understand and have certainty about our relationships that drives the creation, recognition and uses of identity.

In exopolitical mediation we engage with identities which are not operating in mainstream society to the degree that the community of humanity understands their relation with or to them. This relationship is not defined by society but rather by the individuals or groups from which they originate. So in exopolitical mediation it can be said that the mediator is working with individual and group identity forms.

The Insiders

The majority of the current work exopolitical mediation engages involves insiders to the Contact paradigm. Insiders is defined as an individual or group who is involved to some degree with extraterrestrial contact or the peripheral of the control structure. There are two forms of insider. One is a non-organized form who is a member of the public and has no ties to an official or organized contact engaging structure. This form encompasses the Contactee and the Abductee. The difference between the two being whether contact is perceived as a positive or negative experience involving willing or unwilling engagement. The second of the two forms is participatory in an organized contact control structure and can involve anyone who is a member or peripheral experiencer of that structure (CCS Insider).

When we discuss the subject of identity we are looking at key questions which grant us understanding of relationship on the personal, social, and institutional levels. A personal level is defined as how an individual sees itself and how others see it. A social level is defined as how elements of society see or relate to individuals or groups in a group context such as culture or more defined context such as skilled professional. An institutional level would refer to the ability of a organized structure such as a state, governmental, or corporate organization to influence or play a defining role in identity which can be seen in categorization of cultures, biological identity, and social group identities into organized identity tools such as identification documentation, group management, or exploitation processes.

Some of the key questions we look at in exopolitical mediation is:
1. What is individual or group identity association source?
2. What is individual or group identity association pattern in a societal context?
3. What personal identity categories are in use and which ones are we interacting with?
4. What purpose is involved in the utilization of dominant identity form? Or influence of passive forms?
5. How long has the engaged identities been in use?
6. What indicators are apparent that depict an individual or group nature or emotional composition?
7. What social, cultural, stereotypical, and biological constructs went into creating the present forms of identity in the subject individual or group
8. How has societal naivety played upon and affected this identity construct and maintenance.
9. What are the appropriate categorical activities, behavior, and traits of the dominant or passive identity forms.
10. Are an insider’s identity categories different from mainstream societal individuals and if so in what ways?
11. How has an insider’s identity been maintained and how has it evolved over the individual’s experience within the contact paradigm?
12. How has an individual or group utilized its natural capability to challenge, modify, or ignore expected types of paradigm identity and pre-defined behavior parameters?
13. How binding is identity roles for this individual or group and in what way?
14. What mistakes about the construction or context of identity by groups or individuals, both inside and outside of the Contact Paradigm, express an influence upon the dominant and passive forms of identity present?
15. What are the contextual meanings and values involved in paradigm identities? How do these differ from open societies viewpoint or perceptions to the insider group and individualistic viewpoints or perceptions?

The top tier of identity categories include: personal identity, paradigm group identity, and societal identity. Each of these can be further defined in terms of biological identity (including genetic & gender forms), social, cultural, and stereotypical categories of identity construction and maintenance. Like in open society, identity construction influences can include gender, ethnicity, and social class. However in exopolitical mediation an additional influence is added to this list in the form of institutionally and societally induced secrecy which creates additional division on the social and personal level of categories. Since identities are multi-dimensional the added dimension of secrecy or societal naivety instigates the rise of additional diversity in the creation of differences or defined identity groups. The primary contributing categories to an identity matrix influence through attribution, living experience, or deliberate imposition. They create meaning structures which comprise agency. Agency is the amount of self-control or other influences an individual experiences, possesses, allows, or takes over their own identity and behavior.

An interesting exploration could be made of investigating how identity construction and perceptions affect individual and group experiences. How do the influences involved in identity characteristics affect performance or human potential? Due to the influence of institutional and societal mandated secrecy, an insider’s social resources are highly limited. How are the concepts involving access to social resources imparting different meanings upon the multidimensional nature of identity on both individual and group levels?

Both society and paradigm institutions have created stigmas and derogatory cultural meanings to justify social exclusions and treatments having profound effects on the characteristics that contribute to identity constructions. It is pertinent to be concerned with theses meanings to understand the causes of self-modification of identity which differ from social definitions of identity characteristics. It is also of importance to examine the relativity and relational variances involved in each level of meaning. Because derogatory meanings can impart relativity, it may be difficult to provide a basis for collective identity on the social or societal perceptional level where definitions of positive or negative, ethical or unethical are sought to be applied.

Another influence upon paradigm identities is shared and contested ideas about the necessities of life which change or control the parameters of individual and group identity. These ideas have a profound influence upon capabilities, opportunities, and engagements of individual participants and others in their group or even on a wider context. This affects behavior both inside and outside of the Contact Paradigm on issues of structural or individual operation (behavior), Communication, and Disclosure. (The definition in exopolitical mediation of Communication is different from Disclosure in that, it entails communicative exchanges on personal and group levels which do not include paradigm proof. Communication operates beyond Disclosure under a supposition in which the Contact Paradigm is an existential fact complete with its own history, purposes, and range of effects on both an aware population and a separate unaware population. Disclosure ostensibly includes some form of belief-influencing or conceptual modifying proof of paradigm because it in contrast operates under the belief that a specific someone or group who is uninformed is influential enough and trustworthy enough to paradigm structures and stability to warrant a ‘need to know’ classification.)

Identities for insiders are a means to an end where individuals seek existential certainties in an uncertain world. Fear is a powerful influence on the construction of identity and the operational parameters for that identity as well as whether the identity in question is dominant or passive in its utilization.

For individuals within the CCS, identities can be temporary and fluid where they continually experience modification to integrate with perceived needs in social or operational categories. Modern technologies and the digitalization of identity data allows a unique flexibility for institutional identity modification which has never before been possible. Data can be modified, deleted or created based on perceived need across many societal venues at a rapid pace. It can supersede social perceptions of reality and accreditation or it can contribute to discreditation and a return to a zenith which is 9/10ths below the surface of human awareness. Human health professionals would undoubtedly find this capacity for and ability or practice of rapid identity transformation of keen interest when seeking to understand human health and welfare. An anthropological professional would find it of keen interest in terms of being an example of the human capacity for social, cultural, and environmental adaptation.

Both as individuals and through collective action it is possible to redefine and reconstruct our identities. We can negotiate and interpret the roles we adopt. Through collective action it is also possible to influence the social structures which constrain us, but there are clearly restrictions and limits. The scripts of our everyday interactions are already written and at the wider level structures are deeply embedded in contemporary culture, economy and society. Identity formation continues to illustrate the interrelationship between structure and agency. ~ Quote “Questions about Identity”, Open Learn University unit:

The exopolitical mediator must pay close attention to relevant identity descriptions, as well as other supporting or diverse associative descriptions. The exopolitical mediator is always examining the identity representation in terms of accuracy, integrity, and operational parameters on individual and group levels. For this reason it is markedly important to keep watch on situational context which affects identity and paradigm ensconced behavior. This situational context will modify or change in mediation participants, the definition of stable and flexible features of identity.

Identities are also constructed in relation to place (situational context), difference is unequally weighted and creates categories of outsiders. ~ Quote “Questions about Identity”, Open Learn University unit:




The Extraterrestrials and Ultraterrestrials

For the purpose of this examination of identity relating to non-terrestrials, whether human or non-human type, I will offer this brief description of the difference between extra-terrestrial (ET) and ultra-terrestrial (UT) in terms of current exopolitical usage. Extra-terrestrial refers to a corporal or physically located individual or group of persons not specifically of the classically perceived Earth population of humanity. An ultra-terrestrial refers to a non-corporal entity which whether through type or evolution exists in a non-physical form when involving themselves in our interactive planetary paradigm. Theoretically, the same questions of identity would apply to either of these collective groups and all subcategories possible within them.

Exopolitical mediation’s regard of identity in relation to ETs & UTs begins with the applicability of our preconditioned ideas, parameters, or assumptions involving identity definitions and construction processes which we utilize or apply to ourselves. In terms of applicability the very nature of biological difference is capable of supplanting or dominating certain possible influences on identity. A distinct example of this would be in question of gender. A specie which is not gender specific would not be influenced by the same defining categories or details influencing construction of identity and our human perception of gender-appropriate roles would not apply.

Another distinct influence on our own inter-specie relational perception and an ET or UT perception of identity would once again, be shared and contested ideas about the necessities of life which change or control the parameters of individual and group identity. Specie other than an Earth Human will have undoubtedly different views or concepts about their own necessities of life. How they societally or individually attend to or act upon those necessities may be predisposed to differences from choices which we in an attempt to empathize, might make when perceptionally placing ourselves in their shoes psycho-experimentally. The influences upon another specie may not be discernable to us since differences in biology, origin, local, and socio-cultural nuances among other possibilities will afford a consequential inability to fully discern all influences and their effects, especially when human experience is still collectively small and its interactive activities which add to and improve collective understanding is severely limited through a broken or dysfunctional management paradigm.

When examining the identity of ETs & UTs we are looking at some of the following questions and concepts:

1. Applicability. i.e. Is an extraterrestrial even aware of defined identity as a concept? Is it individual or hive? Is the nature physical, social, cultural or spiritual? How many or which of these terms apply?
2. Definitions of shared and contested ideas about the necessities life as pertain to this specific specie or on a wider Greater Community scale (collective).
3. Depth of form or hierarchy of categories involved in identity
4. Degrees of influence in applicable forms or categories: Biological identity, social identity, institutional identity, cultural identity or other commonly less specified or stereotypically unlikely specified forms. i.e. spiritual or sensory
5. Degree of interactive influence.
6. Individual and collective investments in identity….value, tolerances, & flexibility…
7. How much constraint is exercised in ET or UT social structures and how much agency is involved in shaping the identities of an interacting specie?


The unknown features of identity for which we have no human context available or unknown roles of identity, again, no human context available, or unknown choices as categories contribute to identity. We need to be aware of what we might describe as our inability to be aware of the self by which an extraterrestrial might live.

The importance of the degree of interactive influence pertains to the mutual exchange which occurs when two species meet or interact. There is always something received by both parties. There is a cross pollination in effect. The question is to what degree of influence it occurs or is allowed to influence. Mutual awareness is an example of an absolute. But what other absolutes, intermittent, or flexible influences exist in an exchange and how does it affect how an individual treats identity? Or reacts to personal or interpersonal identity relationships? How are personal identity perceptions and external identity perceptions influenced or affected on both interacting specie?

For example. A human individual’s perception of self alters when a human interacts with horses. A human individual’s defined identity alters with perceptions, reactions to and expressions of identity made by others toward them or perceived by them. Ideas about competency, human nature, and physical ability are modified and applied as constructs which help to rewrite an individual or groups identity when experience with horses is engaged. A person becomes ‘skilled’. A person become capable of exercising ‘empathy’. A group becomes defined by a dominant activity in their human experience. A person or group’s perception of the definition of communication and sentience becomes permanently altered due to an ability to engage in duality or shared terms of existence, physical control, safety, or the necessities of life.

It would be expected that a similar modification or exchange would occur during instances of contact or especially experiences involving environmental, cultural, and contextual immersion. An area of examination in relation to this would be each involved specie’s actions, efforts, and results in coping with change.

It is understood that identity is particularly useful as a concept for depicting the ability to cope with change and uncertainty, as well as the opportunities which arise from encounters with diversity. The nature of identities is, at the very least in human applications, fluid and self-modifying or continually changing in reaction or adaptation to needs and uncertainties. Again applicability would cause us to ask if this is appropriate for an ET or UT individual or group.

An investigation into identity, especially in changing times, raises issues about different relationships and tensions between the personal and the social, structure and agency, conscious and unconscious factors and between sameness and difference. Whilst structures may be very influential in shaping our identities there are always uncertainties and changes which often take place through agency, either that of individuals or collectively through groups of people. Uncertainties can lead to confusion, but change can also create diversity and new opportunities for us to shape our identities. Identity is a dynamic concept that has considerable significance within the social sciences and in our everyday lives. ~ Quote “Questions about Identity”, Open Learn University unit:

A peculiar and particularly ancient voice from humanity’s past gave us a potentially useful insight into change, our relationship with the Universe, and its bearing on our collective identity. This voice speaks to us of sameness and differences and of the deepest human value and context. He addressed our definitions, our reactions, our expressions, our participation, our interpretations and our allowances for change….the balancing act….and the dynamics of spirit. Marcus Aurelius in his personal dialog titled “To Himself” offered this:

Constantly regard the Universe as one living being having one substance and one soul and observe how all things have reference to one perception the perception of this one living being and how all things act with one living movement and how all things are the cooperative causes of all things which exist; observe too the continuous spinning of the thread and the contexture of the web; Thou art a little soul bearing about a corpse…it is no evil for things to undergo change and no good for things to subsist in consequence of change. Time is like a river made up of the events which happened in the violent stream for as soon as a thing has been seen it is carried away and another comes in its place, and this will be carried away too. ~ Marcus Aurelius, To Himself.

We apply this wisdom as we strive to identify with a group of Others….collective identification…how we traverse our initial collective identity through planetary social changes when we join the Greater Community and craft a new link with its own meaning that pertains to us and our relationship. Terminology can illustrate the dynamic processes of shaping, & forming; of transforming identities. Our identities change all the time here on this world….change in identity is not new on this world. Human kind is fussy and experimentive when it comes to terms of identity as seen in evolution of terms and meaning of terms. Humanity is in many ways highly adaptable, always seeking new methods of adapting, and with a penchant for embracing new opportunity.



Reference Notes & Bibliography

[1] Exopolitics Institute PO Box 2199, Kealakekua, Hawaii, 96750, USA http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/ The Exopolitics Institute is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit educational organization dedicated to the study, promotion and support of exopolitics. Exopolitics is defined as an interdisciplinary scientific field, with its roots in the political sciences, that focuses on research, education and public policy with regard to the actors, institutions and processes, associated with extraterrestrial life, as well as the wide range of implications this entails through public advocacy and newly emerging paradigms.
[2] Paradigm Research Group, 4938 Hampden Lane, #161, Bethesda, MD 20814 http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/

[3] Disclosure Project, PO Box 265, Crozet VA 22932, USA http://www.disclosureproject.org/ a nonprofit research project working to fully disclose the facts about UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligence, and classified advanced energy and propulsion systems. We have over 400 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology, and the cover-up that keeps this information secret.

[4] Larry W Bryant UFOView, 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, http://ufoview.posterous.com/

[5] The Open University – Open Learn, Great Britain. http://www.open.ac.uk/openlearn/ An online pubic access educational opportunity offered free of charge to participants in the form of interactive subject and topic units.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Exopolitical Mediation Unit Study Recommendation - Identity in question

Open Learn has a useful unit study available to the public free of charge which can contribute to the understanding of dual identity individuals. A dual identity individual in our field include paradigm participating insiders and contactees or abductees who operate in both the uninformed public venue with a seemingly normal life and within their respective non-terrestrial Contact venues with a dedicated and distinct identity employed for each venue.

Open Learn Unit: Identity in Question

Time: 12 hours
Level: Introductory

Description: Why is identity important and how are identities formed? This unit looks at the many different ways in which identity can be categorised. By examining the requirements of the state, how a child views gender, and the importance of race or place of birth, you will start to understand how each individual can have more than one identity.

Monday, January 31, 2011

What does worthy look like in exopolitical mediation?

Putting the humane back in human

How do we place a value on a human life or their personal experience? Every person is a deeply rooted individual with a unique character impacting the world they participate in. We define a worthy person as being honorable or admirable; having merit or value. What does this mean and how do we recognize it in our field? How do we define a person’s value to human society or human potential?

A good starting place is in understanding the mediator’s greatest pit fall. This is projecting our intentions on the behavior and view of others and calling ourselves objective. We must learn to see ourselves and how we see others. Finding what worthy looks like is dependent upon our ability to determine if what we are looking at is reality or principle-based or if it is a function of conditioning and conditions. The mediator uses its endowments of self-awareness, conscience, imagination, and independent will to act on that awareness; making promises, setting goals or limitations, acting with courage and strength, sharing empathy, uplifting others and being true to our integrity; leading by example.

If we value communication, teamwork, and cooperation, then worthy will appear interdependent or seek interdependence. Interdependence is a very mature concept where greater accomplishment comes from interaction, access to vaster resources and the potential of others or all people. An interdependent person or situation will present an opportunity to share meaningfully and doing so is a choice only independent individuals (participants) can make.

A participant in exopolitical mediation will not always present a physical asset, but it will bring a human asset. This is what the mediator continually evaluates. The human asset is an evolutionary matrix with revolutionary net effect on the human paradigm. The human asset will have a uniquely modified nature, set of values, and an unusual contribution capacity. These characteristics display a unique sense of identity in an individual. Integrity, and self-control is usually pointedly adhered to and trust-based relationships are not an option but a requirement.

The contribution of the worthy will be an influence or influx of profound internalized-growth in consciousness, imagination, and human-will through their presence. It is through that deep contact with our basic paradigms; the values and the vision of what we can become that we discover the degree of worthiness we have encountered. This understanding, gained through interdependent interaction is a time-consuming endeavor made gradually not quickly. A mutually beneficial relationship is built together, endearing their participation and receiving the mediator’s strength and confidence in return. This activity elevates all lives involved and builds bridges where few existed before by the teamwork of conscious endeavor. In the words of Thomas Paine, “That which we obtain too easily, we esteem too lightly. It is dearness only which gives everything its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price on its goods.”


Stephen R Covey on Synergy

Exopolitical mediation is about creating synergy. It is an effort to open the minds, hearts, and expressions of the people to new alternatives in the human experience. It presents us with new options to avoid the great tradgedies and wastes in life by tapping the potential in humanity which usually remains undeveloped and unused.

Stephen wrote in his book "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change" the following thoughts on synergy:

…it catalyzes, unifies, and unleashes the greatest powers within people…simply defined it means that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts….The creative process is the most terrifying part [of synergy] because you don’t know exactly what’s going to happen or where it is going to lead. You don’t know what new dangers and challenges you’ll find. It takes an enormous amount of internal security to begin with the spirit of adventure, the spirit of discovery, the spirit of creativity. Without a doubt, you have to leave the comfort zone of base camp and confront an entirely new and unknown wilderness. You become a trailblazer, a pathfinder. You open new possibilities, new territories, new continents, so that others can follow.

Synergy is everywhere in nature. If you plant tow plants close together, the roots comingle and improve the quality of the soil so that both plants will grow better than if they were separated. If you put two pieces of wood together, they will hold much more than the total of the weight held by each separately. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. One plus one equals three or more.

The challenge is to apply the principles of creative cooperation, which we learn from nature, in our social interactions….The essence of synergy is to value differences – to respect them, to build on strengths, to compensate for weakness. Synergy can create a new script for the next generation – one that is more geared to service and contribution, and is less protective, less adversarial, less selfish; one that is more open, trusting, more giving, and is less defensive, protective, and political; one that is more loving, more caring, and is less possessive and judgemental.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

From the Desk of Cyrellys: My exopolitics articles 2010 - January 2011

I've recently been examining exopolitics in a purely political and philosophical perspective. I've been watching the new global governance form up and its spread of nation dismantling behaviors. Extraterrestrial contact as a political and social issue within the global shared infrastructure is seemingly closely interrelated to many surface actions in a way we generally don't verbalize. One of the issues I've perused extensively is patriotism and rhetoric in the context of the exopolitical paradigm. The following articles are my initial muse... fledgling thoughts in need of further fleshing out but illustrative of some places I'm exploring in regards to exopolitical mediation.

Thoughts On Liberty & Contact Disclosure

The Depth of Changes Rolling Out With Global Governance and The Contact Paradigm

The Future of Learning To Communicate With ET

Shattering A Blue Beam

Global Governance in Early January 2011

Watching End of Sovereign Governments & Rise of Corporations

Global Misbehavior: Information Control

My opinion on bad ET experiences

Patriotism is political

FiOs.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Global Misbehavior: Information Control

Of Head-Hunters, Attack Poodles, & Communicators

There are three interlocking groups of information controllers operating in the public arenas where exopolitical mediation is concerned. One is part of the journalistic genre, another involves individuals associated with three-letter-acronym agencies, and the other are strong-willed opinionated individuals with their own ideas of righteousness who band together with like individuals and members of the first two groups.

In exopolitical mediation we have referred to these groups and individuals as 'head-hunters'. Head-hunting is a human behavior in which non-believers or anti-disclosure advocates seek exploitable weakness of any kind and then use it to destroy the message of researchers, contactees or insiders, along with their ability to communicate further, their reputations, careers, and public/private lives. This term applies to the toxic behavior irregardless of the truth pertaining to the individual presenting their story or knowledge. The working concept being that two wrongs do not make a right.

"It is hard to contend with passion for whatever it desires to get, it buys at the cost of Soul." ~ Heraclitus, On Nature.

A passionate believer in some ideal, or need will be more inclined to cross illicit boundaries. This being true of those who do not want the manufacturing or manipulation effort ensconcing our true paradigm, publicized in its stark entirety. There is no communication nor disclosure effort which will not have to contend with these forces.

Catherine Austin Fitts describes this in the accompanying video. She refers to head-hunters quite appropriately as 'attack poodles'.

BrasscheckTV publisher puts it this way:

...the three most common ways that the "news" media makes information safe for Corporate America (the actual rulers of the country):

1. Ignore the story completely (a favorite)

2. Dillute daily TV news shows and newspapers with so much junk reporting there's no room for real stories (they've got to put something on the screen)

3. Allow blatant lies on the part of "officials" and bought and sold "experts" to stand without even rudimentary research and analysis (it cost too much, don't you know)

However, occasionaly a story gets away from them (think Gary Webb and his Dark Alliance reporting.)

Then somebody actually has to do some work - that work being the attempted destruction of the reputation and career of the news source (usually a lone reporter or a publisher that's not safely "in the loop.")

There's a revolving door between the "news" industry and the PR "professionals" who take on this kind of work.

The system is so literally innudated with organized corporate interests that any portion can and does get used to control information which attempts presentation to the public. Insiders and contactees routinely express attitudes of powerlessness. This is their feeling that no matter what they do it will have little or no effect on their situation or the direction human life is taking. This in turn reinforces the condition of powerlessness which is the inability to contol the events that shape their lives and the lives of others. Attitudes or perspectives of this form of powerlessness "become barriers to effective self-help, independence, and self-respect."1

Look at the situation many of these individuals reside in. For starters many are affluent in some way. They have careers, some have power, a respectable income, resources, and reputations. These are the exploitable weaknesses. Why? Because they can't imagine how to live without any of it or how to recover from their loss. Many contact participants on the inside in particular have never done without. This is a little described form of poverty. Kenneth B Clark, an social psychologist, describes the poverty of powerlessness happening when human beings who live apart from the rest of society, who do not share in society's affluence, and who are not respected or granted the ordinary dignities and courtesy accorded to others will eventually begin to doubt their own worth.

Head-Hunters or Attack Poodles take advantage of this inherent culture of powerlessness which has been created by the secrecy in order to control the information about it. This culture is passed from one generation of participants to the next as a self-perpetuating cycle. The rest of humanity picks up on this culture through the effectiveness of the information controllers and further perpetuates it by inserting further toxicity through negative derogatory comments, votes of unsubstantiated disbelief, admonitions to speak no further on the subject, exposure of confidential personal life details, and so on which are viewed by other paradigm experiencers. In this way it's passed on preventing any coherent multi-force effort to coelesce together, pushing back the effort to control, supplanting it with an understanding in the mind of the public onlookers.

If we want to understand why the public does not understand or believe in paradigm issues such as corporate controllers, shadow government, global governance, extraterrestrial contact, or alternative human history then we must more thoroughly examine the processes being used to control the current existing information. Those who operate as head-hunters or attack poodles must have every aspect of their operation thoroughly examined and traced; back-engineering, pardon the pun, all the way up the ladder behind them to identify the sources of the anti-reality sentiment. The same is said for being able to function in a mediation or facilitory situation. There should be an expectation of hostile encounters with anti-reality representatives and plans made to address those encounters prior to public efforts.

1 Dye & Harrison, Power and Society, 2005 Wadsworth

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Confidentiality Policy of Compass Morainn

The following policy pertains to work performed as a Member of Compass Morainn (CM) in the field of Exopolitical Mediation and Facilitation. A Member of Compass Morainn is any individual or group who signs on either publicly or anonymously as a member with the Compass Morainn coordinating website or Administrative Personnel and is approached by participant(s) as an active member operating under Compass Morainn Confidentiality Policy. A participant is defined as an individual or group which retains or utilizes the services of a Compass Morainn member operating as an exopolitical mediator, facilitator, or intermediary observing member relaying contacts/information to another member who actively operates as a Exopolitical Mediator, Facilitator, or other CM role.

•All participants are automatically protected by Compass Morainn’s Confidentiality Policy
•All Compass Morainn Members ahere to Compass Morainn's Confidentiality Policy as a term & condition of membership.
•All information obtained from participants is the property of the participant from which it came and public release of any information obtained from a participant is dictated and directed first by the participant and secondly by Compass Morainn's Confidentiality Policy.
•Any potential participant who approaches you as a Compass Morainn member is to be handled respectfully and given due process under Compass Morainn Confidentiality Policy.
•Limit your access to and use of consulting, mediation, and facilitation information to that required by your duties, permitted by law, and authorized by Compass Morainn.
•Use only legitimate and authorized (legal) means to collect information and whenever practical obtain it directly from the participant consulted.
•Release information concerning the person in the program regarding their status only in accordance with the special confidentiality rules & laws that apply to this information.
•Refrain from revealing any participant information unless supported by legitimate Compass Morainn exopolitical mediation or facilitation business or participant care purposes defined by Compass Morainn.
•Do not discuss participant operational or personal information with any person inside or outside Compass Morainn unless it is in connection with your work, permitted by law, and authorized by the participant(s) and by Compass Morainn.
•Be aware of your surroundings and guard against visitors and third parties needlessly overhearing participant information or discussions.
•Refrain from removing or electronically transmitting participant information or records from a designated storage facility or operational area without authorization and the appropriate physical and technical safeguards. i.e. locked containers, encryption, etc.

Compass Morainn members are to operate with the utmost sensitivity to the confidentiality needs of all participants. Even when we do not agree with the stated needs, desires, or intentions of our participants, all Compass Morainn members are expected to and defined by the act to hold themselves to the highest standards of honorable behavior, as well as personal and professional integrity through adherence to this policy.

Rolling Into 2011

Happy New Year! to everyone both inside and outside of Compass Morainn!

2011 is already beginning to shape up into a fantastic year in many respects. Site updates to Compass Morainn have been completed. She's ready to rock! New information has been added. Some of the type cleaned up. And the broken links & widgets are now fixed.

Be sure to drop in and see how we've grown over the last three years. We are now at 61 published members and four unpublished members. If you are an active member in the field of ufology or exopolitics and know someone who would be interested in learning more about exopolitical mediation or in participating in some way, please refer them to the website and invite them in.

This year is beginning with solidifying Compass Morainn's Confidentiality Policy. All members are requested to check out the copy contained either here on the Journal (see next post) or the copy on the website here. Please either make a note on your profile to the effect, "I honor the Compass Morainn Confidentiality Policy" or send Cyrellys an email wrt it so that we can put a honor-flag on all profiles of approachable mediators, facilitators, researchers, etc for our prospective participants. Observers need not foward or post any notation on it if they do not wish to.

We have many new members that have joined us in 2010 and I'd like to take this moment to welcome all of them as members of 2011 too. To all of you who are new or who had not heard, the Compass Morainn Journal is open to publishing for all Compass Members on the subjects of mediation, facilitation, contact issues, contact insider/contactee communication & interaction processes, exopsychology, exopolitics/anthropology/sociology, current events, activities, and news pertaining to Exopolitical Mediation & Facilitation. The broader scope of news may be posted at the News & Data page on Compass Morainn's home site. Personal experiences not related to Exopolitical Mediation/Facilitation, off-topic research or other articles still in the realm of Exopolitics are provided the Exopolitics Wikizine at Zimbio. Those interested in posting in the Journal need to sign in to Blogger and request an invitation to be sent to you from the Admin.

Here's hoping everyone had a great holiday! We look forward to working with all of you through this coming year.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Getting Kids Involved In Contact Preparation

As interested and concerned individuals, people are beginning to look at Contact as an event that requires some forethought....some practical preparation. While debates rage over in the U.N.'s paper-tiger-ville over the creation of real infrastructure, there are others in surprising places who are taking the bull by the horns and turning his energy to constructive work.

In the UK schools like Sanford Primary School are looking at the needs of potential contact senarios such as if a crash of a ufo were to happen in the vicinity of children. They are discussing openly with their children about what such a situation might be like and what to do in the event they are there to experience it or its aftermath.

On October 10, internet author Lounge Daddy published an article on the UK school drills. In it he inquired if the UFO Drills were becoming "something of a routine part of the curriculum in the UK."

From a practical standpoint it makes sense to practice emergency procedures in the event of a ufo crash, just as one would need to know procedures to follow were it an airliner filled with people. On such a craft there would ostensibly be occupants, possibly injured and in need of assistance. It would be the civilized and humane thing to know how to investigate crash, render assistance and to establish the practice of universal caring as Earth's standard operating proceedure.

One email comment rendered on the subject by a gentleman named 'mike', said, "Now I can appreciate this. It is a shame that the schools in America are not so "Open Minded"". Perhaps this is something which the expected Denver Colorado, Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission can begin to tackle once its formation is complete. A formal program for emergency procedures and assistance rendering in the event of a downed EBE craft could be a ground-breaking first project for the new Commission.

This would be a fine example of exopolitical facilitation, where an organization leads through practical real solutions to social and circumstantial problems which may arise in the course of sudden or unexpected Contact under less than ideal circumstances.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Larry Bryant Confirms Will Be In Denver Nov 1 2010 UFO City Central

Compass Morainn member and professional research associate, Larry W Bryant has confirmed that he will be joining others in Denver Colorado on November 1, 2010 in support of the expected passage of Denver's Initiative 300, the initiative for the creation of an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission.

In an exuberant note distributed to his contact list Larry mused over the process saying, "the paradigm shift could be won by a single-vote majority were the Colorado voters to wake up and partake of the potential."

Alfred Lambremont Webre, relayed to Larry yesterday, an excerpt of an new article he'd written, describing how Jeff Peckman, in a recent interview on ExopoliticsTV, said that Dennis J. Gallagher, a former Denver city Councilman, and now the elected City Auditor of Denver CO has predicted that Initiative 300, quote 'is going to pass'.

Should Initiative 300 pass, Denver will have the beginnings of true infrastructure to lead Earth into a new era where ET will have a formal contact point, legitimized by the people of Earth, enabling a true connection between Earth's people and the greater community beyond. This would exceed the progress of recent rumors of a proposed appointment of Maylaysian-born astrophysicist, Dr. Mazlan Othman of the United Nations, to a position of UN Liason for Extraterrestrial First Contact at the UN Office for Outer Space in Vienna back on September 29 of this year.

The need for formal infrastructure was recently underscored at about the same time by Ex-Air Force Officer Captain Robert Salas and others, who held a press conference on a 1967 event where UFOs were deemed responsible for deactivating nuclear weapons at a base in Montana where he served at the time.

Initiative 300 has attracted global attention and support. The initiative has had a petition available online to monitor and gauge support as the work progressed http://www.petitiononline.com/etaffair/petition.html where supporters worldwide could sign and comment upon the effort. Larry commented on the petition describing it as "a Peoples Project of Global Consequence" and that "the unrelenting presence of Universal Flying Objects serve as a unifying force for the destiny of mankind."

A signer commented via email that "Jeff had alot of courage and heart to keep this part of the international Disclosure effort going. It is a model that could and should be followed all over the world."

The text of the Initiative can be viewed at http://www.extracampaign.org

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Updates Completed October 2010 & CM News

Updates to the CM Journal are now complete for this year.

The Journal is accepting outside articles on exopolitical mediation & facilitation. Current Compass Morainn members may post their articles at will as usual. If anyone has any difficulties please email Cy at the CM email.

News: Compass Morainn is now on FACEBOOK with its own page here: Compass Morainn on Facebook

Additional updates and additions are still pending for the website and its sister sites at large. Be sure to check back often as these changes will occur over a period of weeks.

Also on the home site, we have a new addition of an online store featuring exo-mediation promotional materials and gifts such as t-shirts, cups, hats, totes, and more. Please let everyone know that this is a great way to get the word out and as ground-breakers start discussing the current situation within the Contact Paradigm.